27. novembre 2024

Open letter to Prof. Didier Raoult

Hello Professor,

I'm taking the liberty of writing to you at a time when you are raising real questions, in all humility, about the immensity of what eludes scientists and science. In particular, you note the difficulty of knowing how to “backtrack” on interpretations that have gradually become indestructible truths.
I would like to ask you about this 19th-century debate, which you claim is “closed” in response to Idriss Aberkane (1). A debate that ended with the “germ theory”. Period!
But there is a real misunderstanding here. In fact, the debate in question was not about “germs” (admitted, albeit unobservable to most scientists at the time) but about “where these germs come from”.
What we call “germs” in the theory of Pasteur, Koch... are none other than Béchamp's “microzymas”.

So what's the difference between the germ theory and the microzymas theory?

In germ theory, we are considered sterile organisms. By deduction, any living element smaller than the cell (considered the vital element in itself) found in our organisms is then considered foreign, and has inevitably introduced itself into the organism in one way or another.
Since Pasteur, as discoveries have been made, we've come to realize that we're full of germs (or at least their genes), which are now considered “foreign”, without this introduction ever being demonstrated.
So we be would sterile and particularly permeable.

Yet there's a flaw in this approach: Pasteur admitted this asepsis (sterility) precisely because he hadn't succeeded in observing this internal “life” (purely internal, excluding the gut microbiota already known at the time) and refuted it.

And so this internal life should call into question the dogma of asepsis. Béchamp had discovered this internal life by dint of in-depth observation and chemical and functional analysis.
What he understood, and what is largely explained by reproducible experiments (2), is that not only are we not sterile, but we are “populated” by small ferments, vital small ferments, specific to the organism. He demonstrated that these are at the origin of “everything” in living organisms (at the origin of gametes and the only ones present at the very start of embryonic development), of our cells, but also of our “microbes”, particularly when the medium required for a function is no longer adequately provided, these elements becoming morbid.
The germs in our air and environment are nothing other than the remains of living animal and plant organisms.

In other words, the cell is not the vital element per se, but one of the constructs required by these vital little ferments to perform their many functions.
For Antoine Béchamp, “it's all a question of medium”. This speaks to you, I think, as you explain the importance of the medium, to the point of applying “cooking recipes” to create and maintain a culture during a seminar (3).

I would add that these little ferments could also be at the origin of our genes, if I am to believe this publication (4) showing the self-assembly of DNA by granulations in the yolk.
And why not the origin of “transposons” and other “retroposons” that populate most of our DNA (5)?

Understanding that the vital element is smaller than the cell, we could then explain more simply the presence of the so-called “archaeobacteria” responsible for OUR energy metabolism as being these vital ferments specific to the organism, because according to the current explanation, our cells would not be capable of carrying out our own metabolism, but would owe it to foreign elements in symbiosis. Doesn't this shock you?

I was reading a recent publication, which talks about “mito-vesicles” when it was discovered that this energy metabolism can be produced by vesicles outside the cell (6) and, refusing to question existing dogmas, suggests that extra-cellular vesicles “transport mitochondria”. Do we not simply see these vital little ferments outside the cell, capable of metabolism once again?

Because in the end, scientists always find an explanation based on their dogmas, instead of questioning them. To the “truths” are added other “truths” in which science gets lost.

After all, the introduction of viral particles into living organisms has never really been demonstrated. This “introduction” is just a logical conclusion to the fact that we've been wrongly decreed “sterile” - everything now proves otherwise.

These particles could just as well be specific to the organism from which they were taken, which would explain their resemblance to exosomes, which are indeed internal particles that are never envisaged as being living, despite the ever-increasing number of properties we're discovering about them (7). And wouldn't what we call “horizontal transfer” simply be an understandable “genetic resemblance” between similar organisms?

Béchamp's theory is actually called the theory of “organization and life”. I know that “theories” are abstractions and that you're not a fan of them. But you admit the germ theory and base your own interpretations on it. Inevitably, however, a succession of scientific facts will sooner or later lead to a theory.

I've written a book which summarizes this work, as concisely as possible given its scope, and which describes step by step the approach taken by Antoine Béchamp, whose numerous experiments do indeed lead to a theory that scientists have no idea about, or a misconception that must now be re-established.

My publisher, aware of the importance of this approach, is offering a digital reading of this concise synthesis in a 120-page booklet: “Antoine Béchamp, understanding the living”, because that's what it's all about (8).

I sincerely hope that you will overcome your prejudices and become scientifically curious to discover this work, which could totally change your vision of the living world.

With all due respect
October 11, 2024

Brigitte Fau

https://www.bonnes-habitudes.fr/contact/

(1) https://www.youtube.com/live/elq_tVHg1AQ

(2) Some experiments on egg : https://www.bonnes-habitudes.fr/2024/09/02/another-look-at-the-cell/

(3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKntxhM6jug

(4) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968432813001017?via%3Dihub

(5) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU8MmIENsnA&t

(6) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35962195/

(7) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=exosomes

(8) livre numérique : https://www.medicatrix.be/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/FAU-Bechamp-Comprehension-Vivant.pdf

livre papier : https://www.editionsmarcopietteur.com/home/354-antoine-bechamp-la-comprehension-du-vivant-9782872111923.html